Free Guide: How to Plan a Landing Page That Converts in 2025

Back to blog

7 Signs Your MVP Development Project Is Going Off Track

October 11, 2025

Written by Michael McGarvey

6 min read

7 Signs Your MVP Development Project Is Going Off Track

You're three months into your MVP development project. Weekly status meetings happen like clockwork. Your developers seem busy. But something feels off. You can't quite put your finger on it, but your gut tells you the project isn't progressing the way it should.

Most founders experience this uneasy feeling at some point during development. The question is whether you're catching a real problem early or just experiencing normal startup anxiety. The difference matters because small issues caught early are easy to fix, while major problems ignored too long can sink your entire project.

Here are seven concrete warning signs that your MVP development is veering off course, and more importantly, what you can do to get things back on track.

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

Communication Frequency Has Dropped

At the start of your project, updates came regularly. Your project manager responded quickly to Slack messages. Weekly meetings had substance. Now, you're lucky to get a meaningful update every two weeks, and responses to your questions take days instead of hours.

This communication decline is often the first sign of trouble. When developers go dark, it usually means they've hit a problem they don't want to discuss yet, fallen behind schedule, or lost focus on your project.

The fix starts with addressing the issue directly but diplomatically. Schedule a call specifically to discuss communication expectations. Express that you've noticed the change and ask if there are obstacles you should know about. Reestablish your preferred communication cadence with specific commitments: daily Slack updates, twice-weekly check-ins, or whatever rhythm works for your project's complexity.

If you're working with an agency, escalate to their leadership if your direct team remains unresponsive. Good agencies want to know when communication breaks down because it threatens client relationships. If you're working with freelancers or contractors, consider whether you need stronger project management in place.

You're Seeing Features You Didn't Request

Your developer demos the latest build and you notice functionality that wasn't in your requirements. Maybe it's a sophisticated filtering system when you only asked for basic search, or an admin dashboard with features you never discussed.

While this might seem like the developer going above and beyond, it's actually a red flag. It suggests they're not following your specifications, making assumptions about what you need, or padding hours with unnecessary work. Every hour spent on unrequested features is time not spent on what you actually need.

Address this immediately in your next meeting. Thank them for their initiative, but clarify that you need them focused exclusively on approved requirements. Explain that you have limited budget and timeline, and every feature needs explicit approval before development begins.

Moving forward, implement a formal change request process. Any new feature or modification to the original scope requires written approval from you. This protects both parties and ensures everyone agrees on what's being built before resources are committed.

Demos Keep Getting Postponed

Your bi-weekly demo was supposed to happen yesterday, but your developer asked to push it to next week because "they want to have more to show you." This is the second time this month a demo has been rescheduled.

Consistent demo postponements signal that development is behind schedule or that what's been built isn't working properly. Developers naturally want to show polished work, but in an MVP context, seeing rough progress is better than seeing nothing.

Insist on keeping scheduled demos even if the work is incomplete or buggy. Explain that you need to see work in progress, not just finished features. This visibility helps you catch misunderstandings early and provides opportunities for course correction before too much work goes in the wrong direction.

Consider implementing shorter feedback cycles. Instead of bi-weekly demos, move to weekly or even twice-weekly check-ins where you see whatever exists, regardless of polish. The more frequently you review work, the faster you'll catch problems.

The Same Tasks Keep Appearing on Status Reports

You've seen "implement user authentication" on the last three status updates. Or "integrate payment processing" has been "90% complete" for the past month. Tasks that seem straightforward are taking far longer than expected with no clear explanation why.

This pattern indicates your developers are stuck on technical problems they may not fully understand how to solve, or they're dealing with scope creep within individual features that's ballooning timelines.

Request a detailed breakdown of what's blocking progress on these stuck tasks. Often, developers will say something is "almost done" when they've actually hit a wall but don't want to admit it. Create a safe environment for them to surface blockers without fear of judgment.

If technical challenges are the issue, consider bringing in specialized expertise for specific problems. Sometimes a consultant with experience in a particular integration or technology can solve in hours what your main team has struggled with for weeks.

Set firm deadlines with the understanding that if a task isn't completed by a specific date, you'll discuss alternative approaches. Sometimes the right answer is to simplify the feature, use a different technical approach, or temporarily work around the problem.

Your Budget Is Burning Faster Than Expected

You allocated $80,000 for your MVP with an expected four-month timeline. Two months in, you've spent $55,000 and the product is maybe 40% complete. At this rate, you'll run out of budget long before you have a launchable product.

Budget overruns happen for several reasons: poor initial estimates, scope creep, technical challenges that require more time than anticipated, or inefficient development practices. Regardless of the cause, catching this early is critical.

Immediately request a detailed accounting of hours spent versus hours originally estimated for completed features. This reveals whether the problem is estimation accuracy, efficiency, or scope changes.

If your contract is time and materials, consider whether switching to a fixed-price structure for remaining work would provide better cost certainty. If you're already on fixed price, understand what's included and what would trigger additional costs.

Have a frank conversation about your remaining budget and what can realistically be delivered within that constraint. You may need to descope features, extend your timeline by securing additional funding, or find efficiencies in the development process.

Want more to read?

Outsourcing Your MVP vs. Hiring In-House

Compare the real costs of outsourcing vs. hiring in-house for your MVP. A complete breakdown of expenses, timelines, and when each approach makes sense.

The Technology Stack Keeps Changing

First your MVP was going to be built in React. Then your developer suggested switching to Vue because it's "better for your use case." Now they're talking about trying a new framework that just came out.

Technology changes mid-project are expensive and rarely justified for an MVP. They suggest your developers either didn't think through technical decisions properly at the start, are easily distracted by new tools, or are using your project as a learning opportunity.

Push back firmly on any technology changes unless there's a compelling, documented reason. Ask for a written explanation of why the change is necessary, what it will cost in time and money, and what problems it solves that couldn't be solved with the original approach.

For future projects, ensure your technology decisions are made and locked in during the discovery phase with clear documentation of why each choice was made. Changes should require your explicit approval and come with a detailed impact assessment.

You Don't Understand What You're Being Told

Your developer explains why a feature is taking longer than expected, but their explanation is filled with jargon you don't understand. When you ask clarifying questions, they seem frustrated that you don't "get it" or their explanations become even more technical.

This communication gap is dangerous. While you don't need to understand every technical detail, you should always understand the business implications: what's the problem, how does it affect timeline and budget, and what are the options for moving forward.

Establish a ground rule: all explanations must be in business terms you can understand. Technical details are fine if you ask for them, but the default communication should focus on impact and options rather than implementation details.

If your current team can't communicate at your level, you may need to bring in a technical advisor or CTO-for-hire who can translate between the technical team and your business needs. This intermediary can evaluate whether technical explanations make sense and whether proposed solutions are appropriate.

Taking Action Before It's Too Late

The common thread in all these warning signs is that they're fixable if caught early. A project that's 20% off track can be corrected with clear communication and minor adjustments. A project that's 80% off track may require starting over.

Check in with yourself regularly. Are you seeing any of these signs? Are you comfortable with the trajectory of your project? Trust your instincts, but verify them with concrete data about progress, spending, and communication.

Schedule a monthly "project health check" that's separate from your regular status meetings. Use this time to step back and assess whether the project is truly on track or just going through the motions. Look at burn rate versus completed features, timeline projections versus original estimates, and the quality of communication.

Remember that your development team wants the project to succeed. Most issues arise from misalignment, communication breakdowns, or technical challenges rather than malice or incompetence. Addressing problems early and directly, with a focus on solutions rather than blame, gives you the best chance of delivering your MVP on time and on budget.

The key is acting on warning signs when you spot them, not hoping they'll resolve themselves. They won't.

Have a business idea you want to bring to life? Book a call today with PremierMVP.